Search Members Help

» Welcome Guest
[ Log In :: Register ]

Page 9 of 11<<567891011>>

[ Track This Topic :: Email This Topic :: Print this topic ]

reply to topic new topic new poll
Topic: Governments....< Next Oldest | Next Newest >
 Post Number: 81
Slicer Search for posts by this member.
FNG
Avatar



Group: Members
Posts: 23
Joined: May 2000
PostIcon Posted on: Jun. 01 2000,14:15  Skip to the next post in this topic. Ignore posts   QUOTE

Great thread we've got going here. I don't think I've ever seen this much intelligent debate in one place before, but hey, I go to a public school. Ok, now for my rant. This is gonna sound choppy, but I won't remember everything if I don’t put it this way.

1. Democracy works, for the most part. The only major problems that have arisen have come from the inability of government officials to 'shoot themselves in the foot'. This is why campaign finance hasn’t happened, and why the bureaucracy keeps swelling.

2. Blindly killing India and China's poor may eliminate population of limited worth, but what about stupid rich people in the US? They deserve to live over some under-realized potential starving in Asia? I don't think so.

3. On the same note as the previous, I'd like to suggest genetic weeding/ engineering. Its unethical, but hey, so is killing 4 billion people, or even the slightly more humanitarian idea of sending them to their deaths in space. Rather than randomly selecting 4bil to die, select the least viable 4bil. Get rid of the stupidest people, because in the future, robots and virtual reality will eliminate the viability of dumb, strong people anyway. What good is a blacksmith, who is strong enough to wield his hammer, when we have a robot who does it for longer, for a one time charge? And in place of the food for the blacksmith, we have food for 2 or 3 thin, intelligent, scientists/thinkers.

On this note, I'd like to suggest to anyone who hasn't, to read the Dune series. Some great stuff on genetics, and all that. While I'm on genetics and all that, I want to touch on socialism. Why blindly assign people to be garbage collectors or managers? Find out what they are good at, and force them to pursue it. If the have managerial skills and intellect, they become a manager. If they have brute strength, they become a garbage collector. Simple as that.

4. Almost forgot this part... I thought of it this morning in physics as we were discussing energy and watts and power bills. People waste energy and most of their other resources as well. This is because we have plenty of it. Energy's cheap, so why worry about how much we use? Well, here's one reason- it’s inefficient as all hell. Power plants are sitting out there chugging uranium or coal or whatever, and what are they powering? The lights in our empty houses, the TV's blaring to the personless couch. Household's should get a limited quantity of resources, and be made to live within this. There is too much bounty, and its making us lazy. It applies not just to power, that was just the trigger for my brain. Food, for example. You've all heard your parents: "Don't waste, there are children starving in Ethiopia." They were right, they just lacked the motivation to enforce their ideals. With a limited amount of food, you wouldn’t be able to waste, and the excess you no longer received could be sent directly to Ethiopia.


5. It is difficult to say you have to die for the greater good. Nothing could produce a greater feeling of shittiness. See, survival of the fittest does that for us. It’s kind of paradoxical, but I think it makes sense. If people were willing to kill themselves, or let themselves be killed for the greater good, the chance that they would still be living is slim. The whole Darwin theory says that we cannot allow that to happen to ourselves, or at least not without reproducing first.


6. Government IS necessary. You think poverty is a problem now? Imagine it without welfare. All of our problems would be so magnified it would be unbearable. Who would maintain the roads? The people who live on them? Gimme a break, we need government, just like young kids need parents to make them do the unpleasant parts of life. Government is the willpower for the masses.


7. Starship troopers had great ideas. Patriotism is one awesome way to promote altruism. Do it for the good of the country, with a flag to rally around, can be very powerful.


8. Off topic, but anyone ever think of the ridiculousness of time and human existence in general. That stuff creeps me out. I sit in my bed thinking, and I feel like crap whenever the vastness of the universe and time hits me, and I realize I'm barely birdshit on the windshield of this universe.


9. The bodies could be used as fertilizer.


10. Lets get off trying to install ourselves as dictator of the new world, its really stupid.


11. MIB was right - "people are stupid."

Good, I think that's all I wanted to say.

Wait, one more thing. I'm working on forming my own Internet nation, and I'd like some of you to fire me some ideas, or even join up. It's very preliminary right now, but drop me a line at slicer@z.com, or visit the site at www.ProjectMarin.homestead.com

Okay, sorry for taking up so much space

Offline
Top of Page Profile Contact Info 
 Post Number: 82
adeadlyintegral Search for posts by this member.
FNG
Avatar



Group: Members
Posts: 21
Joined: May 2000
PostIcon Posted on: Jun. 01 2000,15:23 Skip to the previous post in this topic. Skip to the next post in this topic. Ignore posts   QUOTE

um... the strong and dumb people who will eventually be made obscelent by robots or whatever WEREN'T put here on god's green earth to work for the powerful and l33t... grr... so what if someone's individual worth doesn't benefit society? wtf does that matter anyway? i mean, if someone is classified as stupid and has no real work skills, should it matter to anyone else? as long as they don't go around slashing tires and shooting people it seems to me that their general worth is their own problem, and shouldn't be measured by how much the people with political power/consumers whoever gains from them, seems arrogant and greedy to me... (long live the homeless man =D
Offline
Top of Page Profile Contact Info 
 Post Number: 83
DuSTman Search for posts by this member.
70% water in a flexible container.
Avatar



Group: Members
Posts: 797
Joined: May 2000
PostIcon Posted on: Jun. 01 2000,15:55 Skip to the previous post in this topic. Skip to the next post in this topic. Ignore posts   QUOTE

Value is in the eye of the beholder.

You may think you're excellent, but if i'm the one that'll be assessing whether or not you are to be killed, your worth to yourself is a useless barometer for me to use. Your worth to me or society would be what you are judged on.

Should i manage to raise a task force for a mass killage, i would either do it totally at random or try and assess your worth in terms of the goal of the mission. The survival of the human race.

Offline
Top of Page Profile Contact Info 
 Post Number: 84
Kolben Search for posts by this member.
FNG
Avatar



Group: Members
Posts: 292
Joined: May 2000
PostIcon Posted on: Jun. 01 2000,16:38 Skip to the previous post in this topic. Skip to the next post in this topic. Ignore posts   QUOTE

One thing from the Matrix that's actually true is the agent saying, that mankind is a plague. We spread and spread until, there's no more room. That's in our dna, that's in our genes. It's a primal instinct. So why should we concerned about saving the human race. It'll never die out, unless some environmental disaster occurs. And what's so good about the human race that it's worth saving? We are greedy, mean and have no concern for other races. Why should it be us that's gonna be saved?

Another thing is...WHAT THE FUCK IS UP WITH YOU PEOPLE?? Do you actually believe that slaughtering 2/3 of the human race would solve anything at all. Or are you just sick perverts who likes to make bloody messes of innocent people. Actually lot's of the people you're talking about (from the 3. world or whatever) are great great thinkers. It's people who's thoughts have gone a lot further than ours ever will. People that maybe actually have remedies for the worlds problems. So I think that the actual problems in the world are you guys who wants to slaughter the smart people. Hitlers' regime was quite efficient, but he was insane. The old people from the time is actually still chocked be their own reactions when they were listening to him. And the only reason why the German people was efficient was because of the "obey or die" thing they had. And what the hell kinda life is that.

Another thing: You can't kill that many people...They'd team up on you and kick your asses. They're twice as many as you. It wouldn't be possible. Throw a nuke at them? You'd destroy the environment and make it inhabitable. And you'd probably just end with getting one back. Because USA is actually not the only country with nuclear capabilities.

People that tries to justify murder makes me sick.
/me pukes in your faces!

Offline
Top of Page Profile Contact Info 
 Post Number: 85
xaustinx Search for posts by this member.
FNG
Avatar



Group: Members
Posts: 78
Joined: May 2000
PostIcon Posted on: Jun. 01 2000,19:48 Skip to the previous post in this topic. Skip to the next post in this topic. Ignore posts   QUOTE

while i agree with 95\% of this.. im gunna have to throw in that whole human spirit nonsense.. if u force someone to pursue a certain life.. all i have to say is GATTICA. That is a very real possiblity. Some people are born to be able to do a certain thing, others have to work thier ass off to accomplish the same goal, but some of those people enjoy that struggle more than the goal itself.
quote:
Originally posted by Slicer:
Great thread we've got going here. I don't think I've ever seen this much intelligent debate in one place before, but hey, I go to a public school. Ok, now for my rant. This is gonna sound choppy, but I won't remember everything if I don’t put it this way.

1. Democracy works, for the most part. The only major problems that have arisen have come from the inability of government officials to 'shoot themselves in the foot'. This is why campaign finance hasn’t happened, and why the bureaucracy keeps swelling.

2. Blindly killing India and China's poor may eliminate population of limited worth, but what about stupid rich people in the US? They deserve to live over some under-realized potential starving in Asia? I don't think so.

3. On the same note as the previous, I'd like to suggest genetic weeding/ engineering. Its unethical, but hey, so is killing 4 billion people, or even the slightly more humanitarian idea of sending them to their deaths in space. Rather than randomly selecting 4bil to die, select the least viable 4bil. Get rid of the stupidest people, because in the future, robots and virtual reality will eliminate the viability of dumb, strong people anyway. What good is a blacksmith, who is strong enough to wield his hammer, when we have a robot who does it for longer, for a one time charge? And in place of the food for the blacksmith, we have food for 2 or 3 thin, intelligent, scientists/thinkers.

On this note, I'd like to suggest to anyone who hasn't, to read the Dune series. Some great stuff on genetics, and all that. While I'm on genetics and all that, I want to touch on socialism. Why blindly assign people to be garbage collectors or managers? Find out what they are good at, and force them to pursue it. If the have managerial skills and intellect, they become a manager. If they have brute strength, they become a garbage collector. Simple as that.

4. Almost forgot this part... I thought of it this morning in physics as we were discussing energy and watts and power bills. People waste energy and most of their other resources as well. This is because we have plenty of it. Energy's cheap, so why worry about how much we use? Well, here's one reason- it’s inefficient as all hell. Power plants are sitting out there chugging uranium or coal or whatever, and what are they powering? The lights in our empty houses, the TV's blaring to the personless couch. Household's should get a limited quantity of resources, and be made to live within this. There is too much bounty, and its making us lazy. It applies not just to power, that was just the trigger for my brain. Food, for example. You've all heard your parents: "Don't waste, there are children starving in Ethiopia." They were right, they just lacked the motivation to enforce their ideals. With a limited amount of food, you wouldn’t be able to waste, and the excess you no longer received could be sent directly to Ethiopia.


5. It is difficult to say you have to die for the greater good. Nothing could produce a greater feeling of shittiness. See, survival of the fittest does that for us. It’s kind of paradoxical, but I think it makes sense. If people were willing to kill themselves, or let themselves be killed for the greater good, the chance that they would still be living is slim. The whole Darwin theory says that we cannot allow that to happen to ourselves, or at least not without reproducing first.


6. Government IS necessary. You think poverty is a problem now? Imagine it without welfare. All of our problems would be so magnified it would be unbearable. Who would maintain the roads? The people who live on them? Gimme a break, we need government, just like young kids need parents to make them do the unpleasant parts of life. Government is the willpower for the masses.


7. Starship troopers had great ideas. Patriotism is one awesome way to promote altruism. Do it for the good of the country, with a flag to rally around, can be very powerful.


8. Off topic, but anyone ever think of the ridiculousness of time and human existence in general. That stuff creeps me out. I sit in my bed thinking, and I feel like crap whenever the vastness of the universe and time hits me, and I realize I'm barely birdshit on the windshield of this universe.


9. The bodies could be used as fertilizer.


10. Lets get off trying to install ourselves as dictator of the new world, its really stupid.


11. MIB was right - "people are stupid."

Good, I think that's all I wanted to say.

Wait, one more thing. I'm working on forming my own Internet nation, and I'd like some of you to fire me some ideas, or even join up. It's very preliminary right now, but drop me a line at slicer@z.com, or visit the site at www.ProjectMarin.homestead.com

Okay, sorry for taking up so much space


Offline
Top of Page Profile Contact Info WEB 
 Post Number: 86
Hellraiser Search for posts by this member.
PH34R M3
Avatar



Group: Members
Posts: 977
Joined: May 2000
PostIcon Posted on: Jun. 01 2000,21:57 Skip to the previous post in this topic. Skip to the next post in this topic. Ignore posts   QUOTE

quote:
6. Government IS necessary. You think poverty is a problem now? Imagine it without welfare. All of our problems would be so magnified it would be unbearable.

While I agree that government is necessary, welfare is not. In fact we as a country were much better off without it. If welfare were eliminated, it’s true there would be a period where the unemployment rate would be high, but eventually those people who sit home everyday waiting for their checks to come would have to get off their sorry asses and find something to do. There is definitely room for every person to be able to find something to do to support himself (or herself). If people can't support themselves they are a drain on the economy and should become the responsibility of family members, communities and charitable institutions: not the government. Government is just too inefficient to deal with things like that. Besides, it’s not fair to us taxpayers to have to fork over some of our hard-earned money to some brainless dolt who is too lazy to go out and earn his own bread and butter.

Welfare is socialism, plain and simple: the redistribution of wealth from those who work to those who don’t. And socialism is a blight that must to be removed from this world. It's great in theory “make everyone equal,” but it relies on the assumption that we are altruistic, and humans by and large are definitely not altruistic. I want as much for me as I can have with as little effort as I can make. And I bet you all share that drive too. I'd even venture to say that 99\% of the human race feels that way (although many would deny it).

Get rid of welfare and bureaucracy and you will have a government that is lean and effective, and in the long run, much better for innovation and development of technology, and thence the species itself.

Offline
Top of Page Profile Contact Info 
 Post Number: 87
xaustinx Search for posts by this member.
FNG
Avatar



Group: Members
Posts: 78
Joined: May 2000
PostIcon Posted on: Jun. 01 2000,23:53 Skip to the previous post in this topic. Skip to the next post in this topic. Ignore posts   QUOTE

If you genetically weed the population i dont see anywhere's near the level people leeching off of welfare. The were created for a certain job, they lose that job, they should easily be able to find another within the same or similiar class, if not, then in that kind of society it would be our duty to take care of them as we overestimated the need for a person of that class of service.

quote:
Originally posted by Hellraiser:
While I agree that government is necessary, welfare is not. In fact we as a country were much better off without it. If welfare were eliminated, it’s true there would be a period where the unemployment rate would be high, but eventually those people who sit home everyday waiting for their checks to come would have to get off their sorry asses and find something to do. There is definitely room for every person to be able to find something to do to support himself (or herself). If people can't support themselves they are a drain on the economy and should become the responsibility of family members, communities and charitable institutions: [b]not the government. Government is just too inefficient to deal with things like that. Besides, it’s not fair to us taxpayers to have to fork over some of our hard-earned money to some brainless dolt who is too lazy to go out and earn his own bread and butter.

Welfare is socialism, plain and simple: the redistribution of wealth from those who work to those who don’t. And socialism is a blight that must to be removed from this world. It's great in theory “make everyone equal,” but it relies on the assumption that we are altruistic, and humans by and large are definitely not altruistic. I want as much for me as I can have with as little effort as I can make. And I bet you all share that drive too. I'd even venture to say that 99\% of the human race feels that way (although many would deny it).

Get rid of welfare and bureaucracy and you will have a government that is lean and effective, and in the long run, much better for innovation and development of technology, and thence the species itself.[/B]


Offline
Top of Page Profile Contact Info WEB 
 Post Number: 88
Anztac Search for posts by this member.
Ronin
Avatar



Group: Members
Posts: 1294
Joined: May 2000
PostIcon Posted on: Jun. 02 2000,01:27 Skip to the previous post in this topic. Skip to the next post in this topic. Ignore posts   QUOTE

Small thing off my shoulders, austin please stop post with quotes. especially long ones. It's redundent. 'nuff said.

Genetic engineering is stupid. I think we should let natural selection run it's course. lIke George Carlin said "we save entirerly to many children here in America!...the child that chokes on too many marbles doesn't get to raise his own kids!". And also it was mentioned by Heinlein in Stranger in a Strange Land: There needs to be a selection process for a species to progress.

------------------
~Anztac - The guy who had the really long sig (formerly Kriegman)

"I am easily driven into a flying rage by blithering idiots"
-cr0bar [The god of this domain]

Offline
Top of Page Profile Contact Info WEB 
 Post Number: 89
Nero Search for posts by this member.
FNG
Avatar



Group: Members
Posts: 105
Joined: May 2000
PostIcon Posted on: Jun. 02 2000,05:05 Skip to the previous post in this topic. Skip to the next post in this topic. Ignore posts   QUOTE

O.K. cool. Kolben just reiterated in a much more logical form what I posted earlier.

Killing large numbers of people is really not a feasible idea. Can we all agree on this? There is a shitty "why" and I don't recall seeing anyone post a "how." The bodies were a problem, but we "solved" that by setting up a new . I think that one got shot down with something along the lines of a mass revolt by those assigned to die. I fully support birth control, we need to curb population growth. Kids should be spayed or neutered (or whatever) as soon as possible. We could go with eunuchs, it worked for Rome. For a while. Reproduction could be done through genetic engineering, like in Gattica. Moving on.

Space doesn't seem like a good idea either. At least in the near future. I could be wrong, but I'm doubting anything approaching safe ormal\marginallycomfortable colonization is going to happen in the next ten to twenty years. So we need to deal with what we have. We need to find a better form of currency to base our economies on. Gold doesn't seem too terribly useful to me. Energy, on the other hand, does. I haven't actually thought out a decent implementation of the energy idea, but it would bring most countries of the world to a more even playing field. If you produce energy, you can buy/build things. If you don't you're gonna need some philathropist friends. That would at least make India and China more economically helpful to the world.

Offline
Top of Page Profile Contact Info 
 Post Number: 90
Observer Search for posts by this member.
I once watched, but I have left.
Avatar



Group: Members
Posts: 912
Joined: May 2000
PostIcon Posted on: Jun. 02 2000,08:25 Skip to the previous post in this topic.  Ignore posts   QUOTE

Along those same lines and also with the idea of population control in mind, one could argue the point that with all of the medical technology we have today, many people are living that would not be living with past technology. Some people feel that we have circumvented the natural selection process. There's your ten-dollar word for you.

Personally, I think a good starting idea for controlling the population level would be to make reproduction only possible through a pill or medical procedure that costs money. That way we wouldn't have the rapid growth in poor areas. It would also be better for the children as well, since those who could not afford to raise children would not be able to have them.

Hmm...maybe that could spawn a new thread.

Offline
Top of Page Profile Contact Info 
109 replies since May 28 2000,17:05 < Next Oldest | Next Newest >

[ Track This Topic :: Email This Topic :: Print this topic ]


Page 9 of 11<<567891011>>
reply to topic new topic new poll

» Quick Reply Governments....
iB Code Buttons
You are posting as:

Do you wish to enable your signature for this post?
Do you wish to enable emoticons for this post?
Track this topic
View All Emoticons
View iB Code