| 
                
                  |  |  
                  | Post Number: 1 |  
        |  |  
                  | Post Number: 2 |  
        |  |  
                  | Post Number: 3 |  
        | 
                
                    | marc c  FNG
 
  
 
 
 Group: Members
 Posts: 145
 Joined: May 2000
 
 | 
                            
                                |  | Posted on: May 18 2000,22:34 |  |        |  You know, I used to think of webmasters who didn't code for both IE and Netscape as lazy and incompetent. But after the experience of designing my own site, I say "fuck 'em."
 Netscape will mangle just about any code, even that produced with it's own HTML editor. And since only 20\% of the people visiting my site use Netscape, there's not much reason for me to try to fix things.Perhaps I will change my mind if the new releases of Netscape are any good, but not until then.
 Oh, and Anztac, your sig is four times as long as your post. I doubt anyone could care less about a paragraph-long Douglas Adams quote (I certantly don't), and I don't want to have to scroll through useless stuff like that. Same goes to zarck, there's no reason to make a one line quote take up four lines by using UBB code. Stick with parentheses, instead. -------------------marcc
 lmao.cjb.net - funny pictures.
 |  
                |  | 
 |  |  
                  | Post Number: 4 |  
        | 
                
                    | Hellraiser  PH34R M3
 
  
 
 
 Group: Members
 Posts: 977
 Joined: May 2000
 
 | 
                            
                                |  | Posted on: May 18 2000,22:53 |  |        |  Yeah, took me hours of additional effort to mangle perfectly good code enough so that it would appear properly in Netscape as well as IE. I had to eventually resort to backgrounds to achieve the effects I wanted to, and even still, Netscape had problems with it. Also, every Java applet I have ever had works with IE, but about 15-20\% of them fail in Netscape. Netscape doesn't properly support the PNG format which is much better than GIF for high quality lossless compression of images, and has numerous other problems which I won't go into here. Suffice it to say that Netscape 4 sucks, which is why I don't use it if I don't have to.
 |  
                |  | 
 |  |  
                  | Post Number: 5 |  
        |  |  
                  | Post Number: 6 |  
        |  |  
                  | Post Number: 7 |  
        |  |  
                  | Post Number: 8 |  
        |  |  
                  | Post Number: 9 |  
        |  |  
                  | Post Number: 10 |  
        |  |  
               |  |  |