|
Post Number: 11
|
Bozeman
Guardian
Group: Members
Posts: 762
Joined: Jun. 2000
|
|
Posted on: Jun. 02 2002,05:27 |
|
|
Which party has openly been the whore of corporations?
Which party doesn't give a rat's ass about the parts of the constitution which talk about equal rights, but go nuts when you talk about guns?
Which party wants to kick you off welfare so you can have a better life, even though you can't get a job because of their economic policy?
Which party wants to take money away from public schools who desperately need every cent, and give it to private schools who don't?
Which party wants to go back to the good old days of the 1960s, when blacks knew their place, and working wives were almost unheard of?
Which party wants buisnesses to be able to lay you off, and not give you benefits you need for you and your family?
Which party wants to bring back American imperialism, and wants to act as the world police for profit?
Which party bombs innocent civillians in Afghanistan, rather than peacefully negotiate with the Taliban, and also replaces them with Northern Alliance thugs, who are just as brutal, if not so religious as the Taliban?
Which party has helped to make the rich richer, and increase the prison population to record heights, the majority of which is black and poor?
-------------- It's the pop-o-matic bubble, motherfucker!
|
|
|
|
Post Number: 12
|
CatKnight
Jedi Republican
Group: Members
Posts: 3807
Joined: Dec. 2000
|
|
Posted on: Jun. 02 2002,06:02 |
|
|
I'll just do these all in order.
1. corporations == people, what's the problem?
2. LIBERALS, duh!!
3. what economic policy prevents them from getting jobs?
4. PUBLIC SCHOOLS DONT NEED ANY MORE MONEY! On average, public schools recieve 5 to 10 times more funding then most private schools, which do much much better on standardized tests. Furthermore, the two cities' school's which recieve the most amount of money, Philly and DC, are also THE WORST schools in the country.
5. no one ever said anything about reverting back to racism or sexism
6. I don't know what you are referring to there.
7. that would be the UN actually, supported by the liberals.
8. that statement is wholly incorrect
9. a) the rich are richer because of the free market, the poor are poorer because of welfare. the rich don't take away from the poor, they GIVE to the poor (directly and indirectly). b) prison population is so high directly because of liberal policies. there are many correlations to blacks, welfare, single parent families, and crime. there are none whatsoever to republicans.
-------------- [url=http://www.personal.psu.edu/users/d/b/dbl125/dfa.jpg]If you strike me down, I shall become more powerful that you can possibly imagine.[/url]
|
|
|
|
Post Number: 13
|
damien_s_lucifer
Emperor of Detnet
Group: Members
Posts: 33
Joined: Jan. 1970
|
|
Posted on: Jun. 02 2002,06:47 |
|
|
/me bows to Bozeman.
with the exception of negotiating with the Taliban... that's kind of like trying to negotiate with a Republican. it just doesn't work.
here's one to add to the list...
which party has the common sense to think that the #1 reason we have so many people in prison is that our laws are too restrictive?
which party thinks that we should focus on rehabilitating prisoners - which has been shown to substantially decrease repeat crime - instead of punishing them as brutally as possible because "it's the right thing to do", even though it results in extraordinarily high repeat offender rates?
which party chooses common sense over dogma?
hint: it ain't the Republicans.
|
|
|
|
Post Number: 14
|
CatKnight
Jedi Republican
Group: Members
Posts: 3807
Joined: Dec. 2000
|
|
Posted on: Jun. 02 2002,07:07 |
|
|
which party has the common sense to think that the #1 reason we have so many people in prison is that our laws are too restrictive?
jee yeah, thats a good idea. are there too many armed robberies? let's not try to figure out why there are too many, and just let them off. Hopefully they won't turn in muderers.
christ DSL I'm just plain tired of your 100% backwards bullcrap. You are so incorrect, so far removed from reality, that me and my room mate were just laughing out loud. I'm gonna have to try to get on rush or quinn and tell them about you.
-------------- [url=http://www.personal.psu.edu/users/d/b/dbl125/dfa.jpg]If you strike me down, I shall become more powerful that you can possibly imagine.[/url]
|
|
|
|
Post Number: 15
|
damien_s_lucifer
Emperor of Detnet
Group: Members
Posts: 33
Joined: Jan. 1970
|
|
Posted on: Jun. 02 2002,07:48 |
|
|
please do. getting trashed by conservative talk radio will only enhance most people's respect for me, lol
as evidence for my statement, I respectfully submit the following :
1. The War on Drugs. Yep, we need to make sure we lock away those marijuana growers and dealers, as well as the users. Why treat addicts when you can jail them instead? That way they can become real criminals!
2. Mandatory sentencing. Let's make sure judges have no authority to use common sense. Another brilliant way to produce more criminals!
3. The DMCA. This is pure brilliance.
|
|
|
|
Post Number: 16
|
demonk
The other white meat
Group: Members
Posts: 800
Joined: Aug. 2000
|
|
Posted on: Jun. 02 2002,07:58 |
|
|
Quote (damien_s_lucifer @ 01 June 2002,23:48) | 3. The DMCA. This is pure brilliance. |
As one liberal to another, you can't blame the republicans souly for this one. Both sides where bought off by the RIAA, MPAA, etc, etc. Both sides are equally guilty of this crime. Ok, timeout is over.
Ready...
FIGHT!
-------------- I'm just two people short of a threesome!
|
|
|
|
Post Number: 17
|
damien_s_lucifer
Emperor of Detnet
Group: Members
Posts: 33
Joined: Jan. 1970
|
|
Posted on: Jun. 02 2002,08:20 |
|
|
agreed, the Democrats are guilty on that as well.
your average liberal doesn't like it much though. the fatcat limousine liberals do, though, and unfortunately they fund the Dems...
campaign finance reform, anyone?
|
|
|
|
Post Number: 18
|
chmod
Jedi Knight
Group: Members
Posts: 373
Joined: Jul. 2001
|
|
Posted on: Jun. 02 2002,16:14 |
|
|
Quote (damien_s_lucifer @ 01 June 2002,23:48) | please do. getting trashed by conservative talk radio will only enhance most people's respect for me, lol
as evidence for my statement, I respectfully submit the following :
1. The War on Drugs. Yep, we need to make sure we lock away those marijuana growers and dealers, as well as the users. Why treat addicts when you can jail them instead? That way they can become real criminals!
2. Mandatory sentencing. Let's make sure judges have no authority to use common sense. Another brilliant way to produce more criminals!
3. The DMCA. This is pure brilliance. |
What about hate crime legislation? Although it's completely useless and serves no purpose whatsoever, it was conceived and supported by liberals mainly as a ploy to gain support from minority groups (well, if there's any other purpose for it, I have yet to be informed of it).
Quote | Which party doesn't give a rat's ass about the parts of the constitution which talk about equal rights, but go nuts when you talk about guns? |
wtf? Just because republicans oppose special treatment doesn't mean they don't support equal treatment.
|
|
|
|
Post Number: 19
|
veistran
We don't listen to people that don't like us.
Group: Members
Posts: 967
Joined: May 2000
|
|
Posted on: Jun. 02 2002,19:07 |
|
|
Quote (kuru @ 01 June 2002,19:24) | Yea, affirmative action does suck. Being a chick is not a handicap for which I need a special leg-up to be a great engineer.
Fuck you very much AA. |
I dunno, I'd say female engineers still need to be at least somewhat more skilled than the avg male engineer to get the same respect that he'd get. Which is definately stupid, but nothing that won't change given time. Just gotta wait for the older engineers to die.
-------------- V|- "Headed down the hard way Concrete battleground Urban monkey warfare Sabotage underground camouflage"
|
|
|
|
Post Number: 20
|
veistran
We don't listen to people that don't like us.
Group: Members
Posts: 967
Joined: May 2000
|
|
Posted on: Jun. 02 2002,19:37 |
|
|
double post! This was too good to pass up.
Quote (Bozeman @ 01 June 2002,23:27) | Which party has openly been the whore of corporations? |
Both.
Quote | Which party doesn't give a rat's ass about the parts of the constitution which talk about equal rights, but go nuts when you talk about guns? |
I think you missed the 1860s, didn't you? Oh and calling Affirmative Action what it is--reverse discrimination--and wanting a better system isn't a wrong thing.
Quote | Which party wants to kick you off welfare so you can have a better life, even though you can't get a job because of their economic policy? |
Yeah, uhhm, as opposed to letting you sit on welfare and pop out more babies that you can't support so you can get more money for you alcohol/crack habit? </sarcasm> But seriously, they want to make welfare what it was ment to be, a very temporary support for those out of work to make sure that we didn't lose important skilled workers.
Quote | Which party wants to take money away from public schools who desperately need every cent, and give it to private schools who don't? |
Well, let's consider this, I went to a school that spent about half of what the inner city schools were spending per pupil, and got a better education. So obviously throwing money at the problem won't make it go away, although it might attract somewhat better teachers. To be honest, the real problem with the education system is that it was designed to churn out factory workers. And that it's got a lot of uneeded layers of beurocracy.
Quote | Which party wants to go back to the good old days of the 1960s, when blacks knew their place, and working wives were almost unheard of? |
Quote | Which party wants buisnesses to be able to lay you off, and not give you benefits you need for you and your family? |
Quote | Which party wants to bring back American imperialism, and wants to act as the world police for profit? |
I'd be glad if we actually got paid to act as the world policeman, I mean we're already damned by everyone when we go and act as world policeman, and damned by everyone if we don't.
Quote | Which party bombs innocent civillians in Afghanistan, rather than peacefully negotiate with the Taliban, and also replaces them with Northern Alliance thugs, who are just as brutal, if not so religious as the Taliban? |
Okay, so which party was in power when we intentionally targeted German civillians with firebombs? Better then devil we know, I mean at least the Nothern Alliance let's us subvert them with MTV.
Quote | Which party has helped to make the rich richer, and increase the prison population to record heights, the majority of which is black and poor? |
Which party has helped the rich get richer? They both help the rich get richer, the rich just change the ways they make money depending on who's in power. See, when you're rich you don't have to spend such a large portion of your assets and most of them can be used to make more money.
|
|
|
|
|
|