Search Members Help

» Welcome Guest
[ Log In :: Register ]

Page 21 of 21<<1718192021

[ Track This Topic :: Email This Topic :: Print this topic ]

reply to topic new topic new poll
Topic: Should children wear thongs?, or has A&F gone off the deep end?< Next Oldest | Next Newest >
 Post Number: 201
Pravus Angelus Search for posts by this member.
Codito Ergo Sum
Avatar



Group: Members
Posts: 81
Joined: May 2002
PostIcon Posted on: Jun. 01 2002,06:46  Skip to the next post in this topic. Ignore posts   QUOTE

Quote (CatKnight @ 31 May 2002,12:49)
You are wrong. Coming from a positivist attitude, just because something is arbitrary, doesn't mean it can't be objective and correct. For example, in modern physics, many new theories seem very strange and do not coincide to with how we experience reality (p-branes, imaginary time, etc). It doesn't really matter whether the mathematical model is arbitrary or not, because if it can accurately make predictions about reality then it is correct. My whole point of this argument is to show that those people who think that September 11th was justified are whackos, and they aren't right, and that those actions can't be justified.

Yeah but there's one very important difference between the physics example and an example of morality.  Theories that may seem arbitrary can still be tested in observable reality.  Since theories make testable predictions, one can determine whether those predictions are accurate or not.

This isn't the case for arbitrary moral principles...there's no way to test if they're "right" or "wrong" (since your test for "right" or "wrong" with regards to morals is based on those same arbitrary principles).  The difference is you can test seemingly arbitrary theories of math of physics and determine in a very non-arbitrary way whether or not they made accurate predictions

--------------
"Lately, the only thing keeping me from being a serial killer is my distaste for manual labor" --Dilbert
Offline
Top of Page Profile Contact Info 
 Post Number: 202
CatKnight Search for posts by this member.
Jedi Republican
Avatar



Group: Members
Posts: 3807
Joined: Dec. 2000
PostIcon Posted on: Jun. 01 2002,07:59 Skip to the previous post in this topic.  Ignore posts   QUOTE

In an abstract line of reasoning, there is no way to proove whether the laws for basic ethics are truly right or wrong using logic alone. In order to continue in that line of thought, faith of some sort would have to be introduced.

If you create a social-contract, that everyone should follow, that is based on mutual self interest, it shouldn't matter what society you are in, the mutual self interest should be the same and thus identical for anyone, therefore it is an absolute moral of a sort. This reasoning works for those who do not believe in a higher power.

--------------
[url=http://www.personal.psu.edu/users/d/b/dbl125/dfa.jpg]If you strike me down, I shall become more powerful that you can possibly imagine.[/url]
Offline
Top of Page Profile Contact Info WEB 
202 replies since May 17 2002,16:47 < Next Oldest | Next Newest >

[ Track This Topic :: Email This Topic :: Print this topic ]


Page 21 of 21<<1718192021
reply to topic new topic new poll

» Quick Reply Should children wear thongs?
iB Code Buttons
You are posting as:

Do you wish to enable your signature for this post?
Do you wish to enable emoticons for this post?
Track this topic
View All Emoticons
View iB Code